Fear of Property
10 Sep - 06 Nov 2022
FEAR OF PROPERTY, INSTALLATION VIEW, 2022. PHOTO: USEFUL ART SERVICES.
FEAR OF PROPERTY, INSTALLATION VIEW, 2022. PHOTO: USEFUL ART SERVICES.
KEVIN BEASLEY, VALENTINES PINES (RESIDENCE), 2022. INSTALLATION VIEW IN FEAR OF PROPERTY, 2022. PHOTO: USEFUL ART SERVICES.
FEAR OF PROPERTY, INSTALLATION VIEW, 2022. PHOTO: USEFUL ART SERVICES.
FEAR OF PROPERTY, INSTALLATION VIEW, 2022. PHOTO: USEFUL ART SERVICES.
FEAR OF PROPERTY, INSTALLATION VIEW, 2022. PHOTO: USEFUL ART SERVICES.
NILOUFAR EMAMIFAR & ISSHAQ ALBARBARY, LITTLE MOUTH OF CHERRIES (DETAIL), 2022. INSTALLATION VIEW IN FEAR OF PROPERTY, 2022. PHOTO: USEFUL ART SERVICES.
FEAR OF PROPERTY, INSTALLATION VIEW, 2022. PHOTO: USEFUL ART SERVICES.
FEAR OF PROPERTY, INSTALLATION VIEW, 2022. PHOTO: USEFUL ART SERVICES.
GHISLAINE LEUNG, PUBLIC SCULPTURE, 2018. INSTALLATION VIEW IN FEAR OF PROPERTY, 2022. PHOTO: USEFUL ART SERVICES.
Artist: Isshaq Albarbary,Joi T. Arcand,Kevin Beasley,Marissa Lee Benedict,Cassandra Press,Daniel de Paula,Niloufar Emamifar,Matias Faldbakken,Karrabing Film Collective,Ghislaine Leung,Christopher Meerdo,Yukultji Napangati,Pedro Neves Marques,David Rueter,Rose Salane,Christopher Williams,Andrew Norman Wilson
Property: something protected or shared or forcefully taken, something gained or lost or desired or enjoyed. Private property plays a role in well-being, some philosophers have argued, but it’s also been the basis for all kinds of exploitation, as history has shown. Either way, so much has come to rest on this concept. It’s an abstract idea that shapes concrete reality in profound ways, shadowed by questions of who owns what, and why, and the friction of public and private interests. As time goes by, property also comes in many different forms: some are physical, others increasingly intangible, some deeply familiar and others leading toward unknown horizons.
Fear of Property develops out of ongoing conversations with artists around these ideas, various related histories and emerging futures, and a range of lived experiences in between. The exhibition also gradually builds on the intuition that property organizes not only social and economic relations, but dimensions of emotional life today as well. The works on view have their own unique contours of feeling as such, even as they draw out concerns around ownership and agency, land and the buildings we inhabit, caretaking, culture and language, artificial intelligence, and more. And some of them might hint at ways of being in the world that aren’t framed in terms of “property” at all.
The exhibition title itself is drawn from an essay by cultural anthropologist Cameron Hu, where he speaks to the underlying logics of futures trading while reflecting on the work of artists Marissa Benedict, Daniel de Paula, and David Rueter. His closing insight in that essay, a “fear of property,” points to disembodied financial inventions that still ripple outward today. In this exhibition, his concept opens up other paths for thought, too, spreading out into many different contexts.
Presented concurrently in two settings, Fear of Property features works by thirteen artists installed in the gallery and six videos by Karrabing Film Collective, Pedro Neves Marques and Andrew Norman Wilson online at Renaissance TV, where they can be viewed throughout the run of the show.
Curated by Karsten Lund.
Property: something protected or shared or forcefully taken, something gained or lost or desired or enjoyed. Private property plays a role in well-being, some philosophers have argued, but it’s also been the basis for all kinds of exploitation, as history has shown. Either way, so much has come to rest on this concept. It’s an abstract idea that shapes concrete reality in profound ways, shadowed by questions of who owns what, and why, and the friction of public and private interests. As time goes by, property also comes in many different forms: some are physical, others increasingly intangible, some deeply familiar and others leading toward unknown horizons.
Fear of Property develops out of ongoing conversations with artists around these ideas, various related histories and emerging futures, and a range of lived experiences in between. The exhibition also gradually builds on the intuition that property organizes not only social and economic relations, but dimensions of emotional life today as well. The works on view have their own unique contours of feeling as such, even as they draw out concerns around ownership and agency, land and the buildings we inhabit, caretaking, culture and language, artificial intelligence, and more. And some of them might hint at ways of being in the world that aren’t framed in terms of “property” at all.
The exhibition title itself is drawn from an essay by cultural anthropologist Cameron Hu, where he speaks to the underlying logics of futures trading while reflecting on the work of artists Marissa Benedict, Daniel de Paula, and David Rueter. His closing insight in that essay, a “fear of property,” points to disembodied financial inventions that still ripple outward today. In this exhibition, his concept opens up other paths for thought, too, spreading out into many different contexts.
Presented concurrently in two settings, Fear of Property features works by thirteen artists installed in the gallery and six videos by Karrabing Film Collective, Pedro Neves Marques and Andrew Norman Wilson online at Renaissance TV, where they can be viewed throughout the run of the show.
Curated by Karsten Lund.